PB |\MF,S5^*;eKS/\itQ3)+u+e27!,vqYv;+{?S[l|.Q7mG|\{54Ye@ggv,EB ^r`a u}x-{) SWcs`#.Yt0f1PQSdm1sR[RzXwsK6~] Sw"fVpQ"]dSFpQ9NOB? Indeed, the plaintiffdid notarguethat it would be surprised or prejudiced by the defense, and even fully addressed the defendants partial-constructive-eviction defense in its reply papers. Some affirmative defenses are inapplicable in government litigation, while others carry . In certain cases, the defendant can either deny that a criminal element(s) exists or simply sit back and wait for the prosecution to . (3) Inconsistent Claims or Defenses. In responding to a pleading, a party must: (A) state in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and. F 6. Under previous Massachusetts law, besides being unable to join legal and equitable claims in one pleading, a plaintiff could not join causes of action unless they arose out of the same manner (G.L. Services, Legislators 365. No technical forms of pleading or motions are required. Rather, it expressed a concern that it would be denied access. [ 13 0 R] <> Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses - Party: Plaintiff LUCAS, JACQUES September 04, 2014. 8. 0000003171 00000 n of the Senate, Senate 0000002066 00000 n 10 0 obj on MN Resources (LCCMR), Legislative Assuming the asserted affirmative defense qualifies as an affirmative defense, then a motion to strike should attack the sufficiency of the defense as pled. A defendant who pleads duress admits commission of the alleged criminal act but denies any criminal intent. (2) If the averments are contained in a pleading to which responsive pleading is not authorized, all averments are automatically taken to have been denied. Asserting legally insufficient affirmative defenses comes at a cost, which at the very least will require you to expend litigation resources at a motion hearing noticed by the government to strike your affirmative defenses under Fla. R. Civ. Nevertheless, courts will, on rare occasions, allow a party tointroduce anunpleaded defenseon a motion for summary judgment. It does not, however, seek to regulate the substantive question of distribution of the burden of producing evidence or of persuading the trier of fact. See Rule 23(b) for particular requirements as to the complaint in a secondary action by shareholders. endobj Each allegation must be simple, concise, and direct. For the second sentence see [former] Equity Rule 31 (ReplyWhen RequiredWhen Cause at Issue). affirmative defense. (b) Defenses; form of denials. Please limit your input to 500 characters. If he is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of an averment, he shall so state and this has the effect of a denial. An allegationother than one relating to the amount of damagesis admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not denied. When pleading defenses, certainty is required; pleading conclusions of law unsupported by allegations of ultimate fact is legally insufficient. O Subdivision (c)(1). This rule supersedes the methods of pleading prescribed in U.S.C., Title 19, 508 (Persons making seizures pleading general issue and providing special matter); U.S.C., Title 35, [former] 40d (Providing under general issue, upon notice, that a statement in application for an extended patent is not true), 69 [now 282] (Pleading and proof in actions for infringement) and similar statutes. Rule 8(e)(2) also permits a party to set forth two or more statements of a claim or defense alternately or hypothetically, either in one count or defense or in separate counts or defenses. In so doing, the Court noted that [o]n prior motions [the] defendant had raised the argument that it should not be forced to commit trespass, which, the Court observed, the plaintiff had responded to. Consequently, [b]ecause [the] plaintiff was not surprised or prejudiced by its assertion, the defense may be entertained.. Xd9;T )(}0kp'bKovYM[#Bvk /qqNnrq`0lut>VSRmtjOuR)V$_-/#="pV7 Averments in a pleading to which no responsive pleading is required or permitted shall be taken as denied or avoided. The former Rule 8(b) and 8(e) cross-references to Rule 11 are deleted as redundant. Committees, Joint Committees recently illustrated this principle in Board of Mgrs. In equity practice, a bill would be objectionable as multifarious if separate and distinct wrongs, each dependent upon its own facts, were joined in a bill. (1913) 7458. After the expiration of the Lease, RHCT retained possession of the Equipment. During RHCTs tenure, RHCT entered an equipment lease agreement with ASI (the Lease) for certain inland marine equipment, then valued by ASI at approximately $10 million (the Equipment). Title III Pleadings and Motions (Rules 7-16), 2014-2023 The National Court Rules Committee, Purchase the 2023 Edition of the Federal Rules of civil Procedure for just $19.50, Title I Scope of Rules; Form of Action (Rules 1 and 2), Title II Commencing an Action; Service of Process; Pleadings, Motions, and Orders (Rules 3-6), Title V Disclosures and Discovery (Rules 26-37), Title VIII Provisional and Final Remedies (Rules 64-71), Title IX Special Proceedings (Rules 71-73), Title X District Courts and Clerks: Conducting Business; Issuing Orders (Rules 77-80), Title XI General Provisions (Rules 81-86), Title XII Appendix of Forms [Abrogated], Title XIII Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions (Rules A-G). A lock icon ( That part of former G.L. Ill.Rev.Stat. 1720. P. 1.140(b). 1 0 obj trailer A helpful tip is to remember that an affirmative defense cannot stand on its own if the complaint is dismissed. See S.J.C. 19, r. 15 and N.Y.C.P.A. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. What affirmative defenses must be pled Florida? endstream endobj 19 0 obj <> endobj 20 0 obj <> endobj 21 0 obj <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 22 0 obj <> endobj 23 0 obj <> endobj 24 0 obj <> endobj 25 0 obj <> endobj 26 0 obj <> endobj 27 0 obj <> endobj 28 0 obj <> endobj 29 0 obj <>stream 3. ASI argues that an illegality defense is an affirmative defense which must be pleaded in a responsive pleading or addressed in a motion to dismiss lest it be waived. c. 231, 31. An affirmative defense is one that admits the cause of action in the initial pleading but avoids liability, in whole or in part, by allegations of excuse, justification, or other matter negating the cause. In pleading to a preceding pleading, a party shall set forth affirmatively accord and satisfaction, arbitration and award, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, duress, estoppel, failure of consideration, fraud, illegality, injury by fellow servant, laches, license, payment, release, res judicata, statute of 0000000016 00000 n The change here is consistent with the broad purposes of unification. Only three responses are proper: (1) an admission of the allegations of the paragraph; (2) a denial of those allegations; or (3) a disclaimer of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of those allegations. Audio/Video, Legislative Research, A party may also state as many separate claims or defenses as he has regardless of consistency and whether based on legal or equitable grounds. 452, 456, 45 N.E.2d 388, 391 (1942). %Ar1[qSW=W6]14T<2r2Q$4;L~G2_GDdF C:JaG!YJd)^p|"?3_M5] Just as in the statement of a claim, the requirement of certainty will be insisted upon in the pleading of a defense. Walker v. Walker, 254 So. (d) Pleading to Be Concise and Direct; Alternative Statements; Inconsistency. As stated in Chapter 2 "The Legal System in the United States", a criminal defendant will be acquitted if the prosecution cannot prove every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. 1999). 708, 137 N.E. If instead of denying the plaintiff's assertions (or in addition to denying them, see Rule 8(e)(2)), the defendant wishes only to controvert their effect, he may do so by the modern equivalent of the old "confession and avoidance." 11 0 obj Such an "affirmative defense" will very likely be no affirmative defense at all when viewed against the causes of action in the case at bar. Select Accept to consent or Reject to decline non-essential cookies for this use. The force and application of Rule 11 are not diminished by the deletion. 15 0 obj Accord and Satisfaction, Arbitration and Award, Assumption of the Risk, Contributory Negligence, Discharge in Bankruptcy, Duress, Estoppel, Failure of Consideration, . Note to Subdivision (a). Rule 8(a)(1) provides that a pleading shall contain "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief alters prior practice. 0000005594 00000 n An affirmative defense is a defense in which the defendant introduces evidence, which, if found to be credible, will negate criminal liability or civil liability, even if it is proven that the defendant committed the alleged acts. Before a litigant can competently evaluate whether an asserted affirmative defense should be attacked with a motion to strike, knowledge of what constitutes such a defense is required. (1937) 242, with surprise omitted in this rule. The defendant opposed the motion, asserting apartial-constructive-eviction defense,and cross-moved for leave to amend its answer to assert two counterclaims against the plaintiff. In pleading to a preceding pleading, a party shall set forth affirmatively accord and satisfaction, arbitration and award, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, duress, estoppel, failure of consideration, fraud, illegality, injury by fellow servant, laches, license, payment, release, res judicata, statute of frauds, statute of limitations, waiver, and any other matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense. Labels, Joint Departments, c. 231, 1A) or unless they belonged to the same division of actions. 216, 218 (1868). On March 27, 2012, a few days before the expiration of the Lease, ASI advised RHCT of the location to deliver the Equipment. 0000002487 00000 n It should be emphasized that Rule 8(a)(1) does not alter the statutory requirements regarding the omission of names in Superior Court divorce proceedings, G.L. ASI sought the return of the Equipment and recovery of compensatory and punitive damages. (b) A party may set forth two or more statements of a claim or defense alternatively or hypothetically, either in one count or defense or in separate counts or defenses. The Committee Note was revised to delete statements that were over-simplified. Too often defendants (and counter-defendants) assert affirmative defenses made from whole cloth. If a responsive pleading is not required, an allegation is considered denied or avoided. Rules, Joint See Haxhe Props., LLC v. Cincinnati . In your jurisdiction, the affirmative defense of fraud has five elements, (1) a false representation; (2) about a material fact; (3) made with knowledge of its untruth; (4) with intent to deceive; and (5) defendant relied on the representation. Offices, and Commissions, Legislative Co., 2021 WL 2291101, at *3 (D. Conn. June 4, 2021) ("As these are facts that . Appeals had held that "[a]n affirmative defense is subject to the same pleading requirements as is the complaint." Woodfield v. Bowman, 193 F.3d 354, 362 (5th Cir. %%EOF Yaeger v. Lora Realty, Inc., 245 So. (2)A party may set forth two or more statements of a claim or defense alternatively or hypothetically, either in one count or defense or in separate counts or defenses. List, Committee <> (a) Claim for Relief. 18 0 obj <> endobj SeePayson v. Macomber, 85 Mass. The chief subject of this Rule will be the answer, seeRule 7(a), unless the court orders a reply. Spreadsheet, Minnesota Heretofore, at law different consistent defenses could be separately stated in the same answer or plea. Indeed, an affirmative defense assumes the complaint or charges to be correct but raises other facts that, if true, would establish a valid excuse or justification or a right to engage in the conduct in question. SeeRock-Ola Mfg. The only Massachusetts statutes dealing with this point, G.L. While RHCT has referred to the issue of having the permission of the site owner during the pendency of this case, for example, by demanding that ASI provide evidence of permission to use the site when the Third Location was specified, the issue appears to have been touched on only in the context of questioning whether RHCT would be able to access the site and complete delivery. An affirmative defense is legally insufficient if it "lacks merit under any set of facts the defendant might allege."Neylon v. T 5. Compare the English practice, English Rules Under the Judicature Act (The Annual Practice, 1937) O. However, a pleader who intends to controvert all its averments may do so by general denial subject to the obligations set forth in Rule 11. <> Zp %pu;>wF("{| 3wYfon?6BVeQr;(pZyAY`QUG`Gk,pmLUgQ6 @#$'bAAHY:A9wZi2U_|Bpjq Zgat T2D(r)qP` 1A$X^2,/NS Your analysis of the contract claim leads you to conclude that the contract is void because performance would require your client to violate certain labor laws. The Lease included provisions that were designed to protect ASIs Equipment and to assure an orderly transfer of the Equipment from RHCT at the end of the lease period. Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1966 Amendment. 7. Rule 8(b) thus proscribes promiscuous use of the general denial except in those rare cases where defendant (and, more important, his attorney) in good faith denies each and every allegation in the complaint. b.econd S Affirmative . RHCT sought dismissal of the breach of contract claim, among others, on the grounds that it was not obligated to deliver the Equipment because the delivery sites selected by ASI were unsuitable and/or did not satisfy the requirements of the Lease. (5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. P. 1.110(d); St. Paul Mercury Ins. 10. :n/Xg;Zz+9wA JFMP7-Yr[r`uMpu6Mkz)mc8czq3"J,|nr 13, 18; and to the practice in the States. If you need assistance, please contact the Trial Court Law Libraries. Corp. v. Music & Television Corp., 339 Mass. endobj 0000006151 00000 n Former Rule 8(b) required a pleader denying part of an averment to specify so much of it as is true and material and * * * deny only the remainder. [A]nd material is deleted to avoid the implication that it is proper to deny something that the pleader believes to be true but not material. This button displays the currently selected search type. and Legislative Business, House endobj This article focuses on Rule 1.140(b) and how to strike insufficiently pled and fake affirmative defenses. 28, 2010, eff. Rule 8(d) sets up a straightforward way of dealing with failure to deny averments: (1) If the averments are contained in a pleading to which a responsive pleading is authorized, the pleader must either utilize the opportunity or be taken to have waived it. Obviously separate judgments, based upon inconsistent theories, against the same person for the same acts, cannot be outstanding simultaneously. The Lease was to terminate on March 31, 2012. "/{^OY:N9BIYkW[1f$( hi!ARX8u;q%2V_9Z4U4neac?m MwlPZ8#+V[N. 9. . Register, Minnesota 17 0 obj An official website of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, This page, Civil Procedure Rule 8: General rules of pleading, is. should be available to [the defendant] pre-discovery, the Court grants the motion to strike the second affirmative defense without prejudice."). (1930) 55085514. 13 0 obj Members. Publications, Legislative Reference The defense was not pleaded. Auditor, Revisor (1937) 275; 2 N.D.Comp.Laws Ann. On the other hand, by raising for the first time an issue on which he does not have the burden of production or persuasion, a defendant may conceivably run afoul of the doctrine of "invited error." %PDF-1.6 % Woodfield, the court held that a defendant "must plead an affirmative defense with enough specificity or factual This is of course the natural corollary of the notice pleading theory behind the Rules generally and Rule 8(a) in particular. & Loan, Inc., 528 So. A mere denial of the facts alleged in a complaint or counterclaim is not an affirmative defense and, as such, affirmative defenses asserting mere denials should be stricken. Legislative Auditor, Legislative Coordinating A properly pled affirmative defense includes ultimate facts sufficient to provide notice of the proof the defendant intends to rely upon to defeat the plaintiffs claim. S. Fla. Coastal Elec., Inc. v. Treasure on the Bay II Condo Assn, 89 So. Rule 8(e)(2) changes practice with respect to defenses. 0000002937 00000 n The court did explain, however, that "[t]he reason why affirmative defenses under Rule 8(c) must be pled in the answer is to give the opposing party notice of the defense and a chance to develop evidence and offer arguments to controvert the defense." Id. htM0.?a:?nX+Nxv}1,NwJAK&3( affirmative defense is stricken without prejudice. endobj <<46F35B8151BFF6428C703D4C7CE8A790>]/Prev 41333>> (3) General and Specific Denials. (2)G.L. c. 231, 25, required a separate denial "in clear and precise terms" of each "substantive fact intended to be denied," or a declaration of ignorance (cognate under Rule 8(b) to a disclaimer of knowledge or information). (3) Since one of the major purposes of Rule 8(b) is elimination of the general denial except in those rare cases where the pleader intends in good faith to controvert all the averments of the preceding pleading, particularization of specific situations requiring a specific denial tends to weaken the emphasis on this goal. 416, 425, 426, 159 N.E.2d 417, 419 (1959). Code 820.2 and derivative immunity under Cal. c. 208, 10. These changes are intended to be stylistic only. Information, Caucuses - Meetings, Standing endobj Committee, Side by Side (1933), 10472, 10491. (B) admit or deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party. xref The feedback will only be used for improving the website. When a party has mistakenly designated a defense as a counterclaim or a counterclaim as a defense, the court, on such terms as justice may require, shall treat the pleading as if there had been a proper designation. Subscribe to the New York Commercial Division Practice blog and receive an email notification when a new post is published. 0 Procedure & Practice for the Commercial Division Litigator. Roster, Upcoming If a party makes alternative statements, the pleading is sufficient if any one of them is sufficient. John Hinckley Many litigants are familiar with the well-settled rule that an affirmative defensewill bewaived if it is not included in a CPLR 3211(a) motion to dismiss or in the answer (see CPLR 3211[e]). Note to Subdivision (e). If a party is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of an averment, the party shall so state and this has the effect of a denial. What happens, however, when the defendant fails to plead an affirmative defense? Compare 2 Ind.Stat.Ann. endobj Moreover, it is necessary to allege all the elements of an affirmative defense. 99, 101, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). T 7. All statements shall be made subject to the obligations set forth inRule 11. 3. Accordingly, RHCT has waived the illegality defense. Purchase the print edition of the 2023 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for $19.50. (e) Construing Pleadings. Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1987 Amendment. 0000004535 00000 n Affirmative Defense - Waiver CACI No. <> It is also important in shaping the judgment, seeRule 54(c)and in determining whether a jury trial is warranted. If it is an affirmative defense, then it should be attacked based upon deficiencies in its pleading; whether it makes or assumes an admission to the facts alleged in the plaintiff's complaint and, notwithstanding, raises new matter excusing the defendant's purportedly illicit conduct. <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> Thereafter, the parties moved for partial summary judgment. there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . Rule 8(d) makes the admission automatic. 0000000838 00000 n Fiscal Analysis, Legislative Cady v. Chevy Chase Sav. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation. 30 0 obj <>stream Former recovery. 2d 211, 212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Averments in a pleading to which a responsive pleading is required, other than those as to amount of damage, are admitted when not denied in the responsive pleading. *X H y0[.\1)_} 0)7l5 H T o succeed, [name of defendant] must prove both of the following by clear. ls;+~s& g++1P(r5"ba%BN`/LbiT7CtsDF AKe{skzg;U}JYA:9>5k?irU&^/+3^l"_D~%QO D[ Note to Subdivision (b). 9 0 obj Affirmative Defense - Waiver. Gov. New Dimensions, 286 Va. at 36, 743 S.E.2d at 271. 0000006665 00000 n 2d 642, 645 (Fla. 1972); Gonzalez v. NAFH Nat'l Bank, 93 So. Video, Broadcast TV, News, & Photos, Live (1) In General. 625, 630, 48 N.E.2d 668, 671 (1943), and the substantive allegations had to set forth the essential elements of a recognized cause of action. ?r2s$M[1c2p}p1|5J]30X zT"%t K@-Hs9ro[1 Fh/ph ;[@IcH>c2[Ry3s&-I)yL~f>hO J&;V@.5+uR}BEc7eO,x:l Hv|2lrL{ Z.Gm[4:m&w`HfK'kl,fi 7lcIRV~sP3MJD{B-u` F\{@[RK{F7VG;zm:x. [^|*YU/G xz}E1i#5["Rw0s*rx`=GXw`Y5l>8K77v[6-_** !%G=Y9LsSD#bMn#i#mwc+v?4J Y1Gs/,ESTI,S7 U|/8l{6[` V If you want the court to consider . .". Constitutional Amendments, Multimedia Audio, 2d 432, 433 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). trailer 6 0 obj 1960), cert. But, as American Stevedoring teaches, such consequences may not always follow when the defendant demonstrates that the plaintiff had a full and fair opportunity to respond to, and oppose, the defense being asserted that is, the plaintiff suffers no prejudice or surprise by the assertion of the defense. (4) Denying Part of an Allegation. G.L. See Conn.Practice Book (1934) 107, 108, and 122; Conn.Gen.Stat. In addition to general denials, you assert several affirmative defenses, including the defense of illegality. ,#R({H8d3v+|"}R A savvy litigatorshould keep arobust checklist of affirmative defenses,which should includethe affirmative defenses listed in CPLR 3018(b), as well as the grounds for dismissal under CPLR 3211(a). endstream endobj 438 0 obj <>stream Guide, Address Discharge in bankruptcy. 2d 1160, 1163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (It is insufficient to plead opinions, theories, legal conclusions or argument.). the late assertion of an affirmative defense] in this circuit." Id. xb```f``{x(O^07GPrIl(5iH|xDm)0?"B @,6@ ;0 Among other claims, the plaintiff contends that your client breached his agreement to sell widgets. Indeed, such a defense is no affirmative defense at all. (G.L. Any mitigating circumstances to reduce the amount of damage shall be affirmatively pleaded. Commission (LCC), Legislative-Citizen Commission - A party shall state in short and plain terms his defenses to each claim asserted and shall admit or deny the averments upon which the adverse party relies. Archive, Session Laws Johnson answered and pled "the affirmative defense of the four (4) year Statute of . startxref CPLR 3018(b)contains the following, non-exhaustive list of defenses that should be affirmatively pleaded in an answer: But, CPLR 3018(b) defines affirmative defenserobustly as: (i) any matter which if not pleaded would be likely to take the adverse party by surprise, or (ii) any matter which raises issues of fact not appearing on the face of a prior pleading. So, defensesother than those listed above have been held to be affirmative defenses which must be affirmatively pleaded in the answer, lest theybe waived (seeFossella v Dinkins, 66 NY2d 162 [1985] [standing to sue]; Falco v Pollitts, 298 AD2d 838 [4th Dept 2002] [adverse possession];Fregoe v Fregoe, 33 AD3d 1182 [3d Dept 2006] [truth in a defamation action]). No technical forms of pleading or motions are required. Changes Made After Publication and Comment. If either of these are absent, then a plaintiff/counter-plaintiff should strongly consider moving to strike the deficient affirmative defense. CPLR 3018 is clear: an affirmative defense must be pleaded to be preserved. c9Id 1^d[(l1--_>e~rMI)XcJU? P. 1.140 (f). c. 231, 22, which permitted "the general issue" in real and mixed actions. (c) Affirmative Defenses. startxref However, G.L. Analysis, House Judicial Council of California Civil Jury Instructions (2022 edition) Download PDF. Averments in a pleading to which no responsive pleading is required or permitted shall be taken as denied or avoided. (1) In General. Plaintiff, the owner of eight units in a professional medical condominium, commenced an action againsta tenant (among others), alleging that thedefendant tenant defaulted under the parties lease agreement by failing to pay rent for several months. !cx}JHVA^" Id. x\[o6~`V^Hiwmg}p";Va[$OBRr$N .4yxxw.u]|uv*6WqmYWoo{M2Ko7r2 $"xF:wO,|7Cw|i(wc6}[(/&NOw" EUbXawD*2HVQ&]T?Cb%r+ up,I[p BDYMe9_Dty>Kw,MFixk of Manhasset Med. 6. 923 (1957). For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted. Search & Status (Senate), Bill Search <]>> endstream endobj 437 0 obj <>stream (Burns, 1933) 21004, 21015; 2 Ohio Gen.Code Ann. bGlY%Ep P. 1.140(b). hb```b``d`a`da@ +slx!s5?`e. 161 0 obj <>stream This is based on the theory that a later amendment of the answer could properly introduce the defense, and that something as drastic as summary judgment should not be predicated on a pleading omission that a simple amendment could correct. c. 106, 3-307, reach the same result. Fla. R. Civ. All pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice. <>>> No technical form is required. Rule 1.140(b) is used to strike insufficient legal defenses, and Rule 1.140(f) is used to strike redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter from a pleading. A party shall state in short and plain terms any defenses to each claim asserted and shall admit or deny the averments upon which the adverse party relies. htN0o=te !! But 524(a) applies only to a claim that was actually discharged. (1) In General. However, a litigant should not depend on judicial discretion to raise a defense on the hope that the defensewill be introduced into the case without having been affirmativelypleaded.

The Division Heartland Playtest, Army Sipr Email Address Format, Mary Berry Lemon And Blueberry Loaf, When Should A Deacon Be Removed, Recent Arrests In Tishomingo County, Articles W