leica m240 vs m262 image quality

BTW the battery life of a charge is awesome. So as I said in the first few paragraphs, now its on its way out, I thought I should do it the justice of writing a few parting words about it. Fortunately, when the image popped up in Lightroom, it was fine or at least it was little different to a photo that I might have expected out of the M262. I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. I turned off automatic review and theres no chimping, and with an ISO dial I dont even need to use any buttons throughout a shoot. So, the obvious question: why not the M10-D? But in the context of the fact that functional simplicity is a big part of what attracts people to Leica cameras, its hard not to be impressed by the Leica M262. As mentioned, one of the big selling points Leica hung their marketing angle off when launching the Leica M262 was the reduction of menu options to 2 screens compared to the M240. By Ive spent the last month or so shooting with a Leica M [typ 240]. No more out of focus shots. I did, yes I have an M10-P now. I decided that I wanted to keep the one camera that can do close to everything I need in the digital world (and for me, this includes personal and occasional professional work, mostly product still photography, but also videography). I just dont shoot it at that high ISO for it to be a problem, and often wonder what on earth people are doing with their cameras to need the sorts of high ISOs that get spoken about it reviews. By continuing to browse our site, you agree to our use of cookies. M262 is simple M240 less some features not necessary to still picture but in M240, those features can be ignored. Material choices as well as the overall fit and finish are second to none. My primary reasons for upgrading were: better high ISO capabilities ie. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Here is a quickreview and comparison for the Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 rangefinder cameras. Its user interface is simple, uncluttered and largely very logical. dslr . Is the 262 different in this regard? Anyway, Im firmly off topic at this point, but almost two years on and I have no gripes at all with the M10. The M240 shot..more DR it seems. As @Jeff Skindly pointed out (when I asked about the M262), this might be a better place to seek views and opinions on this model. The beauty of the Leica M262 is what they took away.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_16',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); That being said, even with major Leica models the upgrade path involves such small incremental changes. Just feels like the marketing department have taken over the machine room, unfortunately. Nice review.I bought a m262 this year when one of my pensions surprisingly came out.I wanted1] a digital leica m2] no video3] no live view4] no EVFBut i like to sometimes review a pic when i am out and about.The 262 is perfect for me and i love it.with the m-e 240 being announced i have noticed that used 262 cameras have already dropped in price so its possible i can buy a dream 2nd body.Meaning another 262. Very nice work. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. The big round dial on the back of the M9 was always tricky to use. This might be the better screen, or it might be residual live-view-denial telling me that the more simple M262 is a better camera for me. The combination of the live view and the advantages I had begun to feel a physical ISO dial could bring to the table were then enough to have me wondering how much of my kit Id have to sell to change up to the M10. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? I am looking to get into the Leica M systemhave been on various of the Leica Fora, discussing the merits of an M9 / M9P. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. One is not better or worse than the other, they are just different. As I said at the end of that post, I then found myself in with a big chuck of the dreaded GAS. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. I am aware many own the Monochrom and love it to death. When moving from M9 to M262 Id not put too much thought into how much difference this would make to me, in practice though, this small change in interface makes a big difference to how the camera feels. To me this seems like a hassle. It then required a short trip to camera-hospital in Germany. Leica M Typ 240. Using the right SD card is key here. Your link has been automatically embedded. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. Value for money, incredible quality. A blessing in some ways, though frustratingly its taken the edge off a feature Ive enjoyed more than I expected to. Image quality is exceptionally good across the native ISO range, the weight has been decreased substantially, and . I completely agree about the thumb rest, adds more (in a bad way) than removing the screen takes away, in my opinion. I also dont shoot flash and I dont bracket, so really the only part of the set-menu thats of use to me is the ISO settings, and the ISO settings have their own dedicated button. You cannot paste images directly. By comparison, the Leica M240 had a lot of features many of which, as Ive alluded to, were seen by some as not needed on a Leica M rangefinder. The M10 has the new ISO wheel on the top left. Really useful! My biggest problem with the digital M bodies is I cant use my Summicron DR on them (although, havent tested it on an M10 yet). Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. The new Leica M is the most innovative and versatile M-Camera that the modern M-System has ever created. It seemed it was not much larger than an M7; that, alone, was enough to make me decide I would own one someday. It was mentioned in LFI first issue of 2016. M262 can be more pleasing in use as lighter with longer lasting battery and a bit quieter than M240. Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. More battery power can be an indication of longer battery life. Upload or insert images from URL. I didnt discover this, despite that being how the M9 works. Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6. I think the sensor is the same, only the signal processing is different because there is no LV. Indeed, I am an m10 owner who misses my m9. It does make me wonder if they could have slimmed down this body like the M10, were they to have released this camera as a major upgrade rather than a stripped-back sidestep from the M240. Even though this image set was only intentionally overexposed by a single stop in direct sunlight, the highlights from the image samples taken by the Leica M246 and the Leica M Monochrom were blown and unrecoverable in post processing. Bringing up the live-view display gave me what appeared to my taste to be a quite unpleasant representation of the world in front of the camera. When using the M10 in aperture priority mode I dial the EV down to -0.7. Theres a certain robustness or heft to the M240/M262 files that I personally dont see in the M10 files, and that is likely a result of the different sensors used in the cameras. At0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. Also for helping critical focus wide open at close distance. Im really enjoying this site since discovering it! Compared Usage Recommendations More. The image on viewfinder of that camera is very warm yet when the images are loaded onto the computer they are less so. Im used to focus peaking from shooting video with the Sony cameras, so it was such a short leap to press the LV button and take photos in a way that felt familiar. I am primarily a Nikon digital and film shooter, and my quest for minimalism and the fact that I already own a Nikon Z6 mirrorless camera were the major reasons to sell the digital Leica 262. This happens with the M240 from time to time. I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. Help us by suggesting a value. Id mounted the lens to my M262 and was pondering how I was going to get used to shooting a 35mm lens again in such a short period []. Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! by Charles Higham, https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, https://www.35mmc.com/14/10/2017/fuji-x100f-fuji-lost-sight-elegant-original-concept/, A Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon Review - An Optical Wonder! This page is currently only available in English. It unites decades of experience in rangefinder technology with groundbreaking digital technologies: It features a completely newly developed high-resolution full-format CMOS sensor that, in combination with its high-performance processor and the legendary M-Lenses; delivers outstanding . It has been a bit of an adjustment shooting with such a stripped-down camera but Im really learning to love it a lot. The sensor is not the same, by the way. I bought it as temporary replacement camera after my M262 had to pay a little trip to Germany for some repair work. ), and Im now looking to part with the Leica M240 and put the money back into my business (where I borrowed it from). Ultimately, if youre looking for all the bells and whistles, you certainly wont find them on this camera. The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M6 Classic & Leica M6 TTL A Review of Both Variants, Leica M8 (Finally) Falling in love with this aging digital By Taffy Ledesma, Leica IIf Red Dial: Nostalgia, or Tool for Serious Storytelling? It depends on your needs. In case you're confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. How important do you think live view will be for you? Thankfully with the M10 theyve returned to the old system. No. I shoot with 35mm and 50mm lenses. . if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Overall, these changes made the move from the M9 to M262 feel greater than the sum of their parts. Thanks, James. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. For me, theres no place for a comment like Peras. I find it to be a useful feature at times. While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). Well worth seeking out. Same settings, same ISO of 320, etc. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. The only shortcoming relating to the auto ISO function is that sometimes I feel like Id like to be able to see the ISO the camera is choosing on a shot by shot basis. as first digital Leica M, I'd take M (typ 262) but if the M (typ240) is cheaper, go ahead. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. To begin with, I tried put the idea to the back of my mind, then one day I opened the cupboard a saw my Monochrom sat there looking underused. The thing is, I much prefer the warm display on the M262. More about being to see the settings at a glance, rather than just be able to change them easily. The sensor is still not what I would consider great (or even competitive) in regards to dynamic range and high ISO quality, perhaps I was just spoiled by the incredible capabilities of the Nikon Df. Since most reviews are quite large in content thanks to extensive coverage, comparisons to other cameras and large sample images, they span across multiple pages for easier reading experience. High quality battery charger is a handy companion for digital shooting. https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. I know this is an old article but so what, I m commenting anyways. I really enjoyed the m60 when I shot it a few years back, but for practical day-to-day photography, I think a screen suits my digital shooting desires better.And besides, the little flip out thumb-rest?! Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. Sadly, that is the way of digital cameras my friend, a never-ending hamster wheel of upgrades. I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way. Here are my thoughts on the M240 alongside my second hand and limited knowledge of the M10. I have gotten perfectly good images with the M-240 at ISO 2000 and at 3200 the images are still manageable with a small amount of noise reduction in LR. Loomis77December 27, 2020 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). Id prefer to do this with the Leica as its the camera I use most often and so the battery is always charged with space on a memory card. Funnily enough, when searching to find out if I was the only one to notice this, I found this post on a forum where someone finds the same issue, but prefers the cooler screen of his Leica M240 to the later M-P version of the M240 which seems to have the same warmer screen as my M262. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. One of the advantages of live-view is the same as one of the advantages of rangefinder cameras they both allow you to observe the world outside of the frame. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. Additionally, I really like the simplified look and small upgrades the MP versions offer. Equally, if I dont find anything particularly bad to say, thats got to be a good thing too, but it doesnt really help in the process of finding things to say. I'm not sure if it's ok to show a snapshot of the LFI article. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. For me and my tastes though, the Leica M262 does feel like an advancement from the M240. It uses a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor with a near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Source: DxOMark. In a world where newer camera models are expected to have more features not less, the Leica M262 doesnt really fit into the normal upgrade path camera manufacturers offer. I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. but it really did sound like something was missing inside compared to the 240. I will stick with my film Leica for now. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. Thanks. At 0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. The 262 probably has a more stable power management, resulting in less banding and thus better high ISO performance. We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. Battery power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. Unfortunately, this isnt something thats fixed by the M10 either though I am definitely looking forward to how much the M10 improves manual ISO control for me. When the Leica M262 was released, Leica proudly told the world that the menu had been reduced to two screens worth of features. The Digital Leica M Samples Gallery (Any digital M from M8 to M-D 262) Below are all images taken with a digital Leica M from the 240 to the m_P to the M-D, the latest and greatest M Rangefinders from Leica Camera. With its excellent dynamic range, beautiful colors, and compact design, it won a lot of fans, but perhaps not . That being said, this is pretty much everything I want from a digital camera or any sort of camera for that matter. M240 v. M246 v. M262 v. Monochrom 246. At which point I bought a stand-in M240 and I discovered the joys of live view on an m-mount Leica. The price is$5195/4050. A series of photographs taken from the same position over a long period is joined together to create a short video. Unfortunately, there are elements of the way the ISO modes work that have slightly bothered me.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_13',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); To be fair, the auto ISO is really well implemented. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Its been that camera that I know is there and just crack out when it feels right. : Leica M240 . I dont need such features on my Leica rangefinders these are real cameras that I use properly, I dont need live-view with my real cameras! I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. (and more M ) when I look at results, there is no difference as they share same sensor. This includes the M10-R, M10-P, M10 Monochrom, M10, and M10-D from the current generation, as well as the M (Typ 240), M-P (Typ 240), M (Typ 262), M-D (Typ 262) and the M Monochrom (Typ 246) from the prior generation. If zinc is your preference the M6 is your baby. Help us by suggesting a value. And given the choice between keeping the M262 and the M240, despite what the Leica M240 brings to the table, it doesnt win out over M262. Display as a link instead, They've been even used in a documentary made by a friend of mine. This never really bothered me about the M9, but having the issue taken away made me appreciate the issue for what it was.

Pick A Premier League Team Quiz, North Island Credit Union Amphitheatre View From Seat, Articles L